Home Feature news Google’s Fitbit Ionic recall doesn’t go far enough, lawsuit says

Google’s Fitbit Ionic recall doesn’t go far enough, lawsuit says

In March, Google announced it was voluntarily recalling 1.7 million Fitbit Ionic smartwatches following reports of 78 burns. Now, a recently filed lawsuit says the recall didn’t go far enough, claiming that the same defect affects all of Google’s Fitbit devices.

According to the court documents, all Fitbit smartwatches and fitness trackers share the same defect — a tendency to overheat, thereby causing burns or creating fire hazards. The complaint also accuses Fitbit of trying to deflect blame onto “consumer hygiene” when incidents are reported, and that the recall doesn’t adequately compensate Ionic owners.

“Reasonable consumers,” the complaint reads, “purchase the Products to burn calories — not their skin — and to safely pursue a healthy lifestyle with the aid of a smartwatch.” The lawsuit’s seeking class-action status.

The two plaintiffs in the case had both bought devices from the Versa lineup — a Versa Lite and a Versa 2 — not the Ionic. Additionally, the complaint shows photos of burns from users who had other devices, including the Sense, Versa 3, Blaze, Inspire, and Inspire 2. It also includes multiple accounts of Fitbit owners being ghosted by the company’s customer support.

The crux of the lawsuit is an allegation that while Fitbit did recall the Ionic, it hasn’t done so for its other devices even though they may also burn users. As a result, customers may be unaware that they are carrying a potential fire hazard. Specifically, the case stokes fears that customers might wear a smartwatch on a flight, not knowing that the battery may be defective. It also notes that while Fitbit offered full refunds to Ionic owners, the company is dragging its feet when it comes to issuing those refunds.

I can’t say I’m terribly surprised to see these allegations. While I have never experienced the issue while reviewing Fitbit’s devices, I’ve seen multiple complaints pop up on Reddit and other social media platforms over the years, where various Fitbit products allegedly burned or irritated users’ skin. While anecdotal, many of those accounts also referenced Fitbit taking months to issue refunds or even respond.

The court documents similarly include several screenshots of replies to the @FitbitSupport Twitter where customers were frustrated with long waits and unresponsive customer service while trying to get refunds for the recently recalled Ionic. We’ve also independently heard from a tipster that the Ionic recall process has been slow going.

Fitbit didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Most Popular

eLearning Thought Leader Q&A: Talking Custom Learning And Overcoming Hybrid Training Challenges With Suresh Kumar DN

Suresh Kumar DN Discusses Building Values And The Perks Of A Robust Learning Platform Suresh Kumar DN, the CEO of Tesseract Learning, is a learning...

Tips To Find The Best LMS To Support ILT Without Going Over Budget

Providing ILT On A Budget One of the reasons many organizations invest in a new LMS is to reduce ILT costs. They want to do...

Blended Learning: Advantages And Effectiveness

Blended Learning: An Introduction Blended learning has been one of the most widely discussed (and implemented) practices of the past few years. But it’s not...

Deep Learning Market: Opportunities In Key Application Sectors By 2030

Deep Learning: Common Applications And Benefits Deep learning market is used synonymously with that of machine learning, yet they are not the same. The former is...